Wednesday, August 27, 2014

RADHIKA. S (119)


CURRICULUM-FUNCTIONS AND PRINCIPLES


INTRODUCTION

Curriculam is an important element of education. Aims of education are reflected in the curriculam. In other wards, the curriculam is determined by the aims of life and society. Aims of life and society are subject to constant change. The aims of education are attained by the school programmes, concerning knowledge, experiences, activities, skills and values. The different school programmes are jointly known as curriculam. The traditional curriculam was subject-centered while the modem curriculam is child and life-centered.
          According to the history of education, the term ‘curriculum’ was originally related to the concept of a course of studies followed by a pupil in a teaching institution. The term ‘curriculum’ is derived from Latin word ‘currere’ which means a ‘race course’ or a runaway on which one runs to reach a goal. Accordingly, a curriculum is the instructional and educative programme by following which the pupils achieve their goals, ideals and aspirations of life. In recent decades, the concept of curriculum has evolved and gained in importance. Increasingly, it is used universally within the framework of globalization, the theory of pedagogy and the sociology of education. At the same time, the concept acquired such an importance that since the 1990s certain authors underscored the risk of an invading epistemology (i.e. the concept being used to indicate all dimensions of the educational process, without allowing any differentiated analytical approach to its complexity).
          In fact, the term curriculum is mostly used to refer to the existing contract between society, the State and educational professionals with regard to the educational experiences that learners should undergo during a certain phase of their lives. For the majority of authors and experts, the curriculum defines: (i) why; (ii) what; (iii) when; (iv) where; (v) how; and (vi) with whom to learn.

          Using educational concepts, we can say that the curriculum defines the educational foundations and contents, their sequencing in relation to the amount of time available for the learning experiences, the characteristics of the teaching institutions, the characteristics of the learning experiences, in particular from the point of view of methods to be used, the resources for learning and teaching (e.g. textbooks and new technologies), evaluation and teachers’ profiles.


CURRICULUMDEVELOPMENT PROCESS

The curriculum development processes can be defined through four phases:
(i)    the curriculum presented to teachers;
(ii) the curriculum adopted by teachers;
(iii)           the curriculum assimilated by learners; and
(iv)           the evaluated curriculum.
          In this cases, the curriculum development process proceeds from the top downwards. The most usual term to indicate this type of process is the English expression “top-down”. In this case, The majority of centralized countries follow this type of curriculum development process. Eg. India.

          In some other cases, the curriculum development process proceeds from the bottom upwards (a “bottom-up” process). In this case as well, four different phases can be identified:
          (i) what the society or the parents want;
          (ii) responses provided by teachers in the schools;
          (iii) the collection of these responses and the effort to modify aspects; and
          (iv) the development of common standards and their evaluation.
          The majority of decentralized countries follow this type of curriculum development process or processes, which are carried out in each school in the context of its community, but without necessarily taking into consideration the developments adopted by other schools or institutions.

New approach of Curriculum development

The current trend is to promote networked curriculum development with several interactions (top-down and bottom-up), while trying to take into account the needs—not only the educational requirements—and to rebuild the way of conceptualizing reality and education systems, in order that political authorities are no longer found at the top, but in the centre of curriculum development dynamics. These authorities thus become stimulating bodies that promote multiple interactions between teaching institutions and society, jointly defining the meaning, the knowledge, the methods and the spaces of education.

          There are several groups working on the curriculum. Nevertheless, comparative studies on the curriculum are not yet abundant. The discipline “comparative education” has rather dealt with issues such as the definition of educational policies, education system structures and trends of schooling worldwide. In recent years, however, a need for more comparative research in the field of the curriculum has come to the fore. Indeed, in recent years, various comparative research projects on students’ learning achievements have been carried out, especially in the most advanced countries of the world. These research programmes could be considered as producing an “international evaluated curriculum”, although this issue has not set off much reaction among the international community.
          On the other hand, the gathering and analysis of information on the curriculum offered to teachers and as taught in educational institutions is not sufficiently developed. To meet existing needs in terms of information, especially for better promoting education to live together in an increasingly interdependent world, UNESCO’s International Bureau of Education (www.ibe.unesco.org), based in Geneva, has received a new mission. Within the framework of this mission, the IBE is one of the sources giving access to information about curricula in the contemporary world and contributing to comparative education.

DETERMINANTS OF CURRICULUM CONSTRUCTION

PHILOSOPHICAL

  • ·       Principle of Philosophy of Education.
  • ·        National Goals.
  • ·        School of thought.
  •  
  • ·        Idealism.
  • ·        Naturalism.
  • ·        Pragmatism
  • ·        Existentialism


PSYCHOLOGICAL

  • ·        Capacities
  • ·        Interest,
  • ·        Attitude of the children.
  • ·        Learning theories
  • ·        Personality
  • ·        Mental Health.


SOCIOLOGICAL

  • ·        Curriculum –
  • ·        Nature of Family,
  • ·        Goals of Nation,
  • ·        Social Needs,
  • ·        Social Evils,
  • ·        Social Problems.


POLITICAL

  • ·        Democracy –
  • ·        Equality,
  • ·        Liberty,
  • ·        Fraternity


SCIENTIFIC

  • ·        Science & Technology
  • ·        Information & Technology


HISTORICAL

  • ·        Country’s Historical background
  • ·        Culture
  • ·        Tradition


ENVIRONMENTAL

  • ·        Pollution
  • ·        Earthquake
  • ·        Ozone Layer depletion

PRINCIPLES OF CURRICULUM CONSTRUCTION

The Principle of Curriculum construction emphasized by John Dewey. They are:

·        Principle of Utility - Subjects included in the curriculum should be useful in solving problems and facingsituations in life. Eg – health and hygiene.
·        Principle of Flexibility – It should be flexible and not pre- determined and rigid. Changes could be accommodated based on child’s interests
·        Principle of Child- Centeredness: Child is the focus of education, content should be based on his/her interest and ability. Eg: primary , secondary etc.
·        Principle of Life- Centeredness: Subjects and activities should be related to life. Eg: Bank transactions.
·        Principle of Community- Centeredness: A dominant role in community development. Eg: values of cooperative action.
·        Principle of Correlation: Cannot be isolated from one another bringing in ARD.
·        Principle of Activity- Centeredness: Purposeful activity and actual life experiences.

According to Secondary Education Commission

·        Principle of totality of experience: Includes all experiences that achieve the physical, mental, social andemotional development of the child.
·        Principle of variety and elasticity: Learning experiences should be based to the diversity of interests, levelsof intellectual development and various talents and aptitude.
·        Principle of core subjects: Include some common subjects like Languages, Science and Social Studies.
·        Principle of linking with community life: Community Life and interaction with community eg: socialservice, school camps.
·        Principle for the use of leisure: Education for leisure develops creativity, aesthetic sense and developvocational skills.
·        Principle of inter-relation of subjects: Correlation of subjects and suggests an inter-disciplinary approach.
·        Principle of Need-based activity: Cater to the needs of society and provide the man-power for social andeconomic development.
·        Conservative Principle: Conservation of cultural heritage, monuments, natural resources and wildlifethrough various subjects and co- curricular activities.
·        Principle of creative training: Stimulates and develops the creative abilities of the pupils

FUNCTIONS OF CURRICULUM
          A curriculum is said to have the following functions
1.Synthesis of the subjects of study and life
The primary aim of the curriculum is to provide the educands those subjects of study which will enable them to bridge the gap between school life and life outside the school.
2.Acquisition and strengthening of knowledge
Acquisition of relevant knowledge in various subjects may be considered as the most fundamental requirement for making the above synthesis possible.Hence it should be considered as a primary function served by the curriculum.By providing and integrating  the various fields,the cognitive structure gets strengthened.
3.Complete development
The aim of education is to achieve the physical, mental,social,moral,religious and spiritual developments of the educand.The curriculum aims at making such a completedevelopment possible
4.Development of democratic values
          The curriculum of education is meant to develop values of liberty,equality,and fraternity,so that the educands may develop into worthy citizens of a democratic country.Special emphasis is laid on the development of values such as tolerance,respect for others,co-operation,we-feeling andcivic sense.This development aims not only at creationof national outlook but also at introducing a spirit of internationalism.
5.Satisfaction of educand’s needs
It is seen that a great variety of interests,skill,attitude,aptitude,etc; are possessed by the educands. A curriculum can satisfy these multifarious needs and requirements of the educand.
6.Realization of values
The ultimate aim of education is the development of character and what is required for this is to helpthe educand internalize various desirable values.Hence,one of the functions served by the curriculum is enabling the educand build up a desirable value system.
7.Harmony between individual and society
The success of democracy depends upon the efficiency of the individuals as revealed in their personal life as well as social life.The society has to look after  individual while the individual has to contribute to the development of the society.Hence,creation of an environment which enables the individual to achieve as well as social efficiency leading to the betterment of the society is another function served by the curriculum.
8.Creation of suitable environment
Whether all the aspects described above would be realized depends on the efficiency of the learning environment provided.Such an environment must assist the educand in achieving the maximum possible development of his intellect,emotions,and skills.Hence,creation of environmental conditions appropriate for each situation is a very important function served by the curriculum for developmental education.
CURRICULAR GOALS
          Curricular goals are the general, long-term educational outcomes that the school system expects to achieve through its curriculum. Three critical elements are included in this definition.
          First, goals are stated much more generally than objectives. Thus, one goal for English language arts might be “Learn to communicate ideas through writing and speak­ing.” One objective for fifth-grade language arts would be much more specific: “Write a letter, with appropriate business-letter form, suggesting a community improvement.” 
Second, goals are long-term, not short-term, outcomes. The school system hopes that after 12 years of formal schooling, its students will have achieved the goals the system has set.
Finally, curricular goals are those outcomes the school system hopes to achieve through its curriculum. Here, it is important to make a distinction between educational goals and curricular goals. Educational goals are the long-term outcomes that the school system expects to accomplish through the entire educational process over which it has control, as Brown (2006) found from a survey conducted with educators, parents, and employers as to what type of skills they believed students should be developing. The following is a priori­tized list of survey responses:
1. Critical-thinking skills
2. Problem-solving strategies and effective decision-making skills
3. Creative-thinking processes
4. Effective oral and written communication skills
5. Basic reading, mathematics, and writing abilities
6. Knowledge of when and how to use research to solve problems
7. Effective interpersonal skills
8. Technology skills
9. Knowledge of good health and hygiene habits
10. Acceptance and understanding of diverse cultures and ethnicities
11. Knowledge of how to effectively manage money
12. Willingness, strategies, and ability to continue learning
                                      

CONCLUSION
The present assignment defines the concept of curriculum and stan­dards, describes the contrasting nature of curricu­lum components, and analyzes the meaning of curriculum to provide some fundamental concepts essential for understanding the comprehensive field of curriculum followed by process of curriculum development, determinants and principles of its construction, functions and goals.
          The current trend is to promote networked curriculum development with several interactions (top-down and bottom-up), while trying to take into account the needs—not only the educational requirements—and to rebuild the way of conceptualizing reality and education systems, in order that political authorities are no longer found at the top, but in the centre of curriculum development dynamics. These authorities thus become stimulating bodies that promote multiple interactions between teaching institutions and society, jointly defining the meaning, the knowledge, the methods and the spaces of education.

REFERENCES:

Bryk, A. S. (2010). Organizing schools for improve­ment. Phi Delta Kappan,    91(7), 23–30.

Benavot, A. (2002). Curricular content and (desirable) societal outcomes:          perspectives and   questions from comparative educational research.        Prospects (Dordrecht,), vol. 32, 1
Teaching for Change ,http://www.teachingforchange.org/
  

No comments:

Post a Comment